Skip to content

Head to head

Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation vs Instant Age Rewind Eraser Multi-Use Concealer

Maybelline New York Instant Age Rewind Eraser Multi-Use Concealer edges out Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation, 8.2 to 7.6. It wins on performance, value and community love, while the Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation is stronger on wear time and shade range.

Benefit fingerprints

What each one does.

Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation

HydrateClarifyRenewGlowCalm & ProtectHair & ScalpFinish & WearScentMoistureBarrierBreakoutsOil & PoresCleanseLines & FirmnessTextureEye AreaEven ToneRadianceSensitiveProtectRepairShape & ShineScalpFinishWearCoverageLashes & BrowsFloralGourmandFreshWoody & AmberHydratingPlumpingLong-lasting moistureBarrier repairDryness reliefFlaking reliefAcneBlackheadsClogged poresOil controlPore refiningShine controlMakeup removalDouble cleansingFine linesFirmingCrepinessSmoothingResurfacingBumps & KPDark circlesPuffinessDark spotsHyperpigmentationAcne marksBrighteningDullnessGlass skinSoothingRednessIrritation-freeUV protectionNo white castAntioxidantOdor controlDamage repairSplit endsHeat protectionCurl definitionFrizz controlVolumeShineScalp careHair growth supportDandruffColor protectionMatteDewySatinNaturalLong-wearTransfer-proofWaterproofBuildableSheer coverageMedium coverageFull coverageBlurringLash lengthLash volumeCurl holdBrow definitionFloralWhite floralRoseVanillaGourmandCaramelCitrusFresh & cleanAquaticGreenWoodyAmberMuskySpicyHydrateClarifyRenewGlowHair & ScalpFinish & WearScent

Maybelline New York Instant Age Rewind Eraser Multi-Use Concealer

HydrateClarifyRenewGlowCalm & ProtectHair & ScalpFinish & WearScentMoistureBarrierBreakoutsOil & PoresCleanseLines & FirmnessTextureEye AreaEven ToneRadianceSensitiveProtectRepairShape & ShineScalpFinishWearCoverageLashes & BrowsFloralGourmandFreshWoody & AmberHydratingPlumpingLong-lasting moistureBarrier repairDryness reliefFlaking reliefAcneBlackheadsClogged poresOil controlPore refiningShine controlMakeup removalDouble cleansingFine linesFirmingCrepinessSmoothingResurfacingBumps & KPDark circlesPuffinessDark spotsHyperpigmentationAcne marksBrighteningDullnessGlass skinSoothingRednessIrritation-freeUV protectionNo white castAntioxidantOdor controlDamage repairSplit endsHeat protectionCurl definitionFrizz controlVolumeShineScalp careHair growth supportDandruffColor protectionMatteDewySatinNaturalLong-wearTransfer-proofWaterproofBuildableSheer coverageMedium coverageFull coverageBlurringLash lengthLash volumeCurl holdBrow definitionFloralWhite floralRoseVanillaGourmandCaramelCitrusFresh & cleanAquaticGreenWoodyAmberMuskySpicyHydrateClarifyRenewGlowHair & ScalpFinish & WearScent

Side by side

Every detail, compared.

We may earn a commission when you buy through links on this page. It never affects our scores or what we recommend. How we make money

Beauty score
7.6Good
8.2Great
Payoff & performance30% of score
7.8
8.0
Wear time15% of score
8.6
7.6
Shade range & inclusivity15% of score
8.4
7.6
Value20% of score
6.8
9.2
Community love20% of score
6.5
8.3
Community
No ratings yet
No ratings yet
PriceTypical, checked by our editors
$52.00/ 1.0 ozPrestige
$12.99/ 0.2 fl oz / 5.9 mlDrugstore
Price per ounceLowest wins
—
$65.11 / oz
What it does
  • Matte
  • Long-wear
  • Transfer-proof
  • Waterproof
  • Brightening
  • Medium coverage
  • Long-wear
  • Hydrating
Made for
All skin types, Oily skin, Combination skin, Sensitive skin, Acne-prone skin
All skin types, Sensitive skin, Dry skin, Mature skin
Format
Foundation
Concealer
Texture
Brand describes a lightweight, fluid texture that is more spreadable and layerable than the original, drying to a dimensional matte
Brand describes a hydrating, silicone-based, crease-resistant liquid with a natural finish, dispensed through a twist-up cushion sponge tip
Finish
Matte
Natural
Coverage
Buildable
Medium
ShadesMore wins
57
18
Fragrance-free
—
—
Claims
Dermatologist-tested, Ophthalmologist-tested, Non-comedogenic
Vegan, Non-comedogenic, Paraben-free
Brand origin
🇺🇸 American beauty
🇺🇸 American beauty
Video reviews
Best for
  • • Oily and combination skin that needs a matte base to last through a long day
  • • Events, heat and workouts where transfer and sweat resistance matter
  • • Shoppers new to Double Wear without loyalty to the original texture
  • • Budget shoppers who want a reliable under-eye concealer
  • • Quick, on-the-go application straight from the tube
  • • Mature skin that prefers a hydrating, crease-resistant formula
Strengths
  • Brand claims 36-hour color-true wear that is transfer-proof, waterproof and sweat-resistant
  • 57 shades with cool, neutral and warm undertones
  • Adds niacinamide, hyaluronic acid and brown algae extract for oil control and hydration
  • Low price for a concealer often compared with NARS
  • Medium coverage that brightens dark circles
  • 18 shades plus 4 color-correcting shades
Watch-outs
  • Longtime users report less coverage per layer than the original formula
  • Some find the new texture sticky and needing powder, others find it drier
  • Fuzzy sponge-tip applicator that some users find messy
  • Some users report it creases easily under the eyes
Where to buy

FAQ

Quick answers.

Which is better, Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation or Instant Age Rewind Eraser Multi-Use Concealer?

Maybelline New York Instant Age Rewind Eraser Multi-Use Concealer edges out Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation, 8.2 to 7.6. It wins on performance, value and community love, while the Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation is stronger on wear time and shade range.

Which costs less?

Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation typically sells for about $52.00 and Maybelline New York Instant Age Rewind Eraser Multi-Use Concealer for about $12.99, based on retail prices when we last checked.

How do you score them?

Both are scored on the same five-factor rubric (payoff & performance, wear time, shade range & inclusivity, value, community love), using the formula or specs, verified creator reviews, community consensus and value. Brands can’t pay for placement.